The Hidden Performance Variable
Why Learning Matters More Than Ever
Over the last twenty-five years I have worked with schools, businesses, authors, entrepreneurs and, more recently, organisations exploring leadership and performance. Although these environments appear very different, I have repeatedly observed one thing they all have in common. Everyone wants to improve performance. Schools seek better outcomes for their pupils. Businesses strive for greater productivity and innovation. Leaders want stronger teams and healthier cultures. Athletes search for marginal gains that can make the difference between winning and losing. Regardless of the setting, the objective is usually the same: to become better tomorrow than we are today.
What has always interested me is that we often focus our attention on the visible aspects of improvement. We invest in better technology, recruit talented people, redesign systems and develop increasingly sophisticated methods of measuring performance. These are all worthwhile investments, but they sometimes overlook something much more fundamental. Before performance can improve, learning has to take place.
Every improvement begins with someone learning something new. It may be acquiring knowledge, developing a skill, changing a habit, refining a process or simply looking at a familiar problem from a different perspective. However we define improvement, learning sits quietly beneath it. It is the hidden process that allows progress to happen, yet it is surprisingly rare for organisations to examine how effectively people actually learn.
Throughout my career I have been fortunate to work with Cognitive Acceleration programmes, metacognition, curriculum design and independent learning. One lesson has become increasingly clear over the years. Learning is not simply the transfer of information. We often assume that because something has been explained, demonstrated or presented, it has automatically been learned. Anyone who has worked in education, leadership or coaching knows this simply is not the case. Information can be delivered in abundance without ever becoming genuine understanding.
Real learning takes place when individuals actively construct meaning for themselves. It requires curiosity, reflection, discussion and the opportunity to connect new ideas with existing knowledge. More importantly, it requires people to think. We often speak about teaching, training or presenting, but much less frequently do we discuss what is actually happening inside the learner's mind. Understanding how people think may be considerably more valuable than simply deciding what information they should receive.
This is one of the reasons I have become increasingly interested in what I now describe as learning architecture. Just as architects carefully design buildings around the way people move through physical spaces, learning environments can be intentionally designed around the way people think, remember, collaborate and solve problems. Rather than asking only, "What do people need to know?", we might begin asking different questions. How will they make sense of new ideas? How will they remember them? How will they recognise misconceptions? How will they apply what they have learned under pressure? These questions move our attention away from information itself and towards the process of learning.
Much of my own work has centred around metacognition, often described as "thinking about thinking". Although the term sounds academic, it is something we all experience. Every time we reflect on a decision, question our understanding, evaluate our progress or consciously adjust our approach, we are engaging in metacognition. Decades of educational research have demonstrated that learners who become more aware of their own thinking also become more effective learners. Perhaps this should not surprise us. If we understand how we learn, we place ourselves in a much stronger position to continue learning throughout our lives.
This feels increasingly important in a world that changes more quickly every year. Knowledge becomes outdated. Technology evolves. New industries emerge while others disappear. The ability to continue learning may now be one of the most valuable professional skills any individual or organisation can possess. Success is becoming less about what we already know and increasingly about how effectively we adapt to what comes next.
Whether we are leading organisations, coaching athletes, teaching children or developing businesses, the principle remains remarkably consistent. Performance is the outcome we see, but learning is the process that creates it. If we genuinely wish to improve performance, perhaps we should spend less time asking how people can work harder and more time asking how they can learn better.
These ideas have gradually developed into what I now describe as the ThinkingBigger Learning Architecture Framework. It is not a programme built around delivering more information. Rather, it is an ongoing exploration of how learning itself can be designed more effectively across education, leadership, organisations and high-performance environments. My hope is that by understanding learning more deeply, we may also begin to understand performance more clearly. After all, before anyone can perform differently, they must first learn differently.
-Gary Fyles